Sunday, April 24, 2022

The Bucha Massacre's Mortar Alley

April 24, 2022

(rough, incomplete) 

updates 4/29, 5/4, 5/15

Bucha Massacre {masterlist} 

Introduction: Fragmentation Denied

One key plank in the idea of a singular, Russian-authored "Bucha Massacre" is to insist people were gunned down at close range - and far worse - by occupying Russian forces. No one was killed by arbitrary artillery shelling from outside the area, because ... why would the Russians shell an area they controlled? To this end, anything that could be a bullet hole OR a shrapnel puncture from an exploding mortar shell MUST be the former - if anyone has their hands tied and seems executed, everyone was executed, or gunned down - and it can only be done by the Russians, because the Russians occupied every inch of Bucha right to March 31, or something to that effect... or so we presume?

There are people found in Bucha who clearly were executed up-close by some pretty evil people. Some were tortured, dismembered, and more. Just in the stretch of Yablunska street we first saw littered with crumpled, gray-faced corpses, BBC reported: "An AFP news agency reporter in Bucha, near Kyiv, counted at least 20 bodies. At least one man had his hands tied." But it seems 19 of them did NOT have their hands tied. "A Ukrainian official told AFP the dead men could have been killed in a bombardment or shot by Russian soldiers, and police would investigate. But the town's mayor, Anatoly Fedoruk, told AFP by phone that all of the 20 dead had been shot in the back of the head. He added that other bodies still lay inside the wrecks of cars destroyed by shelling," and were presumably killed by that shelling. But no one outside a car ever was?

Igor Kossov, Kyiv Independent, 4/22 has a bit more nuance from Mayor Fedoruk: "The Russians had a citywide shooting spree in Bucha. According to Fedoruk, over 80% of the bodies have bullet wounds, largely in the head and torso. “If in Irpin (a city next to Bucha) people died from fragments caused by shelling and mortars, in addition to being shot, then in Bucha people were mainly just shot,” Taras Vyazovchenko, a city council member, told the Kyiv Independent. “There are practically no accidental hits among the victims.” Why would a Russian artillery strike on civilians be an "accident"?

Meduza: "There’s no evidence that the civilians in Bucha whose bodies were found on the streets were killed as the result of military activity in the second half of March." Also "From March 5 to the end of the month, less than ten large fires were recorded in Bucha, while dozens were recorded in Irpin. This suggests that the Bucha residents who died in the second half of March did not die as a result of ongoing military activity."

Well that's 10 large fires in less than a month - plus however many small ones - mortar and rocket strikes that didn't start fires - like 6 of the 7 apparent mortar strikes we'll examine below (A van at least was seemingly ignited in one case) ... a lot remains possible there. 

And for what it's worth, there's at least one place where the evidence tells another story - the same stretch of Yablunska street with about 20 bodies. I've endorsed Petri Krohn's nickname for this place: "mortar alley," in the vein of Bosnia's infamous "sniper alley." 

NPR cites Dymtro Andriv, a Ukrainian National Police spokesperson saying of other massacre victims in Bucha: "We know they were killed by gunfire, because there are many bullet wounds. Then somebody tried to hide this crime by burning the bodies."  Because of what Andriv said, we should wonder if maybe they didn't die from shooting. In fact, he was referring to the bodies of 6, said to include a family of 4, some of them incomplete or fragmentary, charred to anonymity at a site presumably different from the site attack they wanted to hide. (It's been geolocated near the eastern edge of town, and is not part of the study below). 

Now if these folks were killed by shelling in a car as they tried to evacuate ahead of Kiev's reconquest, for example, they'd be torn up and partly burned by the blast, and peppered with bullet-like shrapnel (alt. fragments - possibly sharp flethettes, but that seems to be a different story). That is, they would look about like they do. It's not so clear who would have done that, but it seems Ukrainian officials are furthering the coverup that started with relocating and torching those bodies.

There, and along mortar alley on Yablunska street, WHY do the most-informed Ukrainian sources try to the hardest to hide the truth of artillery strikes on Bucha during its occupation and/or liberation? As I'll explain below, this came from the south, mainly, where Kiev's forces were in control, and it tended to kill people in white armbands, sometimes with Russian-issue food rations - read by some as signs of sympathy or collaboration with the Russians.

Reference map, then SOME explanation. Just this took me too long.

At Least FIVE Mortar Shells Fired from the South

Note: I'm using "mortar" as shorthand for what's clearly a mortar strike in on case, seemingly is in 4-5 others, or possibly some other artillery, or even rockets. They all travel and mainly detonate in a similar and readable way, varying quite a bit in the finer details. I'm not an arms expert, but I do have some advanced amateur experience accurately reading the on the ground signs. What I think we see in 7 examined cases are one tank shelling and six munitions fired like artillery, on a parabolic arc, with basic high explosive fragmentation payloads. 

There are just recently news stories about artillery attacks on Bucha with cluster bombs spreading sharp fletchettes. These reports have Mayor Fedoruk changing his tune and cliaming Russian "landmines" may have also killed people in Bucha. "You don't have to be an arms expert," he notes. (see comments) This is related but different from what we'll examine here. The new stories refer to the time Russian troops were retreating from Bucha in the last week of March, and in unclear locations, while these "mortar" strikes were a different kind, happened along the very edge most exposed to Kiev's forces, and mainly before March 19, per satellite imagery dates, with at least one dated around March 10 (and I'd say the evidence like decay supports that, or anytime in that time span - the cold really matters on that point).

Impact 1) We'll start with the first obvious mortar impact I noticed, amid the famous, first-seen bodies-in-the-street scene, at the corner of Yablunska and Peremohy lane.


My arc of debris spread there is far too wide - I underestimated the foreshortening involved. But aerial and close-up views helped settle these details. Here from a video I took a screen capture from.

In lieu of a full explanation I'd fail at despite being totally right, here's a crude sketch to help you get for yourself why this spread of dirt and asphalt shows the shell's direction of travel at impact.

 
Azov Battalion drone footage - first published via Meduza - have proven quite useful. A March 25 video offers amazingly detailed views of key areas, including around this crater - not oriented to true north...

It's not sure all these three were killed in this strike, but perhaps. The fragments will radiate 360 degrees, with only some of the back half angling right into the ground. They presumably fell and bled heavily right where they were hit, there's been heavy rain since then, and that's downhill. Upper right: bled from the head, probably died quickly, likely with a hip wound later chewed on by feral dogs (there's a photo to clarify that). The other was bodily damaged and bled from all over. Others may have lived and fled, but couldn't recover their comrades. If so, we've never heard their true stories. 

At the bottom is a car near the third body... it might contain the blood he hasn't shed much of across the pavement. That car suffered light shelling damage, or possibly gunfire. Later it was pushed backwards from closer to that crater, by people, back off the street, and it was ransacked. Feminine clothing and such was included, but just one male body visible. Fedoruk: "other bodies still lay inside the wrecks of cars destroyed by shelling." 

This car was moved and searched by on-the-ground people prior to this view of March 25, or the earliest clear view, below, given as 3/19. Another car is backed in just north of this on O. Tykoho street, doors flung open, there from first allowed views. I guess it's cropped from all these images, but it's there, maybe with the same story.

Maxar satellite view, crater and debris in red - also not true north, but closer - actual angle of fire suggested is from the southeast, some 5-10 degrees CCW from this. Actual trajectory should be pretty close to what I drew here, rotated right = just southwest. I'm not there with measuring tools, so I won't venture any precise compass bearing. I drew an exact line, but it's approximate. You need something to put in the bigger-map context. 


That image adds two other apparent impacts in orange. I've been slow to correlate views and agree with others calling these more of the same. As I'll briefly explain, these too seem to originate from the south. 

Impact 2) First, the tree:

Direction: not as clear, but either it came from the north and just cleared that fence or, more likely, it hit from the south. At blast center, there's much force in all directions. The fence is damaged to the right (low piece of trunk) and left (prob. a branch took out one slat), but seems barely to have fragmentation marks from the shell's "shrapnel." (closer inspection still in order) This suggests the blast aimed at the fence but the worst of it was absorbed by the tree instead, so it hit on this (south) side. The spread of (visible) wood debris seems more to the west, suggesting some angle from the east, as with the impact described above, and the one below. How the lower trunk tends to move the opposite way (to the right or east) also makes sense for this angle, but that's hard to explain.

I see just one clear frag mark in the wood, well west of impact and close to this man's head. At his feet, ...a good friend here. Bittersweet with extra bitter and extra sweet. There several of these photos just from Bucha, by the way. There's even one dog who refused to leave the side of another dead dog he or she had deeply cared for. It is moving stuff. But let's focus on the evidence and in just what direction we should be moved.
Someone else with AFP thought these deaths were from shelling rather than execution. But how did the Russians get positioned south of this stretch of Yablunska? That area was Ukrainian-held for the entire time.

Damaged and burned van across from tree impact, perhaps closer to yet another one that's not clear yet.
Who did this graffiti behind the van? 14 = David Irving, 88 = Heil Hitler. "Kiroo"? "Live fast"? $$? Are these call signs of the "Russian world"? Russian false-flag? Oh, wouldn't that be clever like they are. (sigh).


Impact 3) The other one wasn't as clear except from space, in the right light, compared to a decent ground view. (Azov drone video 3/25 seems to just miss showing this crater) Suggested trajectory much like impact 1, but not as clear. Obviously, this is the suspected cause of death for the man on a bicycle laying dead right there, bleeding from the upper body. 


Update 5/4: On March 6, at 10:30 am, Mykhailo Romaniuk, 58, was accompanying Smagliuk" who survived to tell - they were pedaling together when Romaniuk was fatally "shot" by an unseen sniper -
"Romaniuk's body remained for 28 days on a stretch of pavement with a yellow and white curb - his swollen face turned to the side in a grimace, orange gloves still on his hands." This is apparently him. 
His death certificate cites 'ballistic cranial trauma, caused by a penetrating bullet... multiple cerebral lesions and fracture of the cranial cavity', and concludes: 'automatic weapon injury with intent to kill.'" One bullets entered his skull while others just sliced his scalp? And the apparent mortar shell impact right behind him is irrelevant?

Update 4/29: Japanese TBS / NewsDig reports from Bucha add stories and videos from locals 
A video dated March 7 shows impacts 2 & 3 and 6 of the 7 bodies already there - panoramic view with some stitching below. The final and obvious impact 1 and the one body nearest to it would come later. 

The witness says the scene looked that way from March 5 and he only filmed it 2 days later. Russia's reign of terror with snipers to the northwest reportedly began this day ... as did shelling from outside, to the south. Maxar had the bodies appearing between March 9 and 11. Maybe just the final one did, but assuming the video dates are correct, the rest had already happened. (5/4: except anyone killed on March 6, like Mykhailo Romaniuk above, whose addition wouldn't make the scene look much different)

The van was burned by these first views, and it reportedly had another 4 bodies inside. Blurring in the TBS suggests another body was left behind the silver car, for five additional bodies. 

Impact 4) Next we turn to the second case I noticed, handily geolocated by someone else a couple blocks west of the scene above. The mortar shell is not unexploded, as that guy said. It detonated and is now spent, its remaining tailfins visible, stuck in the pavement at a distinct angle. This allows us to see - obliquely here - the radial marks in the pavement on the shell's down-angled side (orange) and the higher fragmentation marks out front, some into the curb and more all across the fence in not such a clear arc. This is along the north side of Yablunska street, so the shell clearly arrived from the south. No space here to explain why - go ask an expert.

This photo is one you won't see posted around very widely. The immediate area is barely even seen so I don't know if there are any corpses nearby. The dropped bag suggests as much, and drone footage shows some dark spots. 

Distance views show the mortar shell still there and then removed. Careful examination says that is just where the tail would be, and it's just the right shape and angle. Someone dug it out finally. Both views are after one of two foreground corpses was removed, and any bodies there might have been near that mortar shell also have been taken away.


Impact 5) Next, in between these a less obvious case, but clear enough with the right photo, is another apparent mortar strike right behind the two foreground corpses. Across a wooden fence on the north side of the street we can see a clear arc of fragmentation marks. These would angle up, and we see several splintered the wood up to a punch-through, while others are just splintered. The impact point with crater is totally unclear, maybe because it impacted on a vehicle that isn't here anymore. Clearly, I suspect this shell killed these two.
Note: these bodies are just west of the intersection of Yablunska and Vodoprovidna, where a likely front line position is evident with a tire barricade on the sidewalk, dark smears of spilled oil as if some heavy vehicles were damaged in some attack here. The area looks clean besides lacking that barricade on the 3rd, and up to these new images of the 12th and 13th. It's first seen as built, then vacated / overrun by first published Maxar view of March 19. (see below, upper right), and we can see it clearer in later images, especially this Azov Battalion drone view of March 25.  

We see a lot of spilled oil and fire and movement of things that aren't here anymore. It was likely some AFVs parked by the barricade made of tires that was attacked, likely jamming the intersection with wreckage and hence the backyards driven through until it was cleared out. This might be a Russian front-line taken out before 3/19, allowing the control over eastern Bucha mapped then by Dr. Abdullah Manaz. That day's map shown below: red line is today (afternoon on 3/19), while purple shows what Russian forces controlled "yesterday." Bucha is fairly visible at upper left, all purple, but with a red line down the middle. This scales out to divide the city roughly in half, with mortar alley, Vodoprovidna and Vokzal'na streets, along with the entire eastern outskirts, back in Kiev's hands. 


More Shelling to the West? Then, further west, we can see suggestions of more shelling from the south: another possible curb hit between this and the tailfin discussed above - closer, maybe one under a stray pipe next to the silver car - further west, a downed utility pole and charred car - a partially flattened car - another downed tree on the south side but toppled south - some further correlation to do there.

Add 5/15 - that further correlation: at image center above is a deformed car - a video I just found (by Denis Kazanskyi) has several interesting views including the tire barricade and nearby cars (2:36-3:55) this car seen up-close, partly melted in a hot fire (1:41) 120 m west of mortar strike 4 - at 203 Yablunska, headed east. The area in front of 203A was reportedly a checkpoint where Russian tanks were stationed (see comment by Andrew). The witness mentions tanks nearby, seeming to blame them for this car, but they'd hit it horizontally from the front. The impact direction not so clear, but it seems hit on the top, passenger side, I think from the south, maybe a bit southwest, if that missing fence is related. 


Further west is a huge downed tree. It's still hard to say just where it is, but some photos I've found show two bodies next to it. An older man with a walker trapped beneath its branches, out on the street just outside a fence the tree has torn open, and younger woman just behind that fence (one of the man's sandals is visible in both views.) The shelling that downed this tree is a likely cause of death, though neither has any obvious and serious injuries. (shelling direction not so clear) The woman is said to be Karina Yershova, but she was said by police to be found in a shallow grave far across town (see Karina Yershova post). But there are some disturbing signs of violation in the scene, as was suspected with her.


Some exceptions to the southern fire rule: 

Light pole near 3/3 tank firing - the fragmentation pattern and its "shadow" suggest horizontal fire - like from a tank - originating nearby to the W-NW hit the base of that pole directly. Drone video of 3/3 seems to show it still standing, but most logically that's when the damage happened. Maybe someone pulled it down later to make a roadblock. It's down like that by first new views of 3/19.


Some questions about who was the cyclist and who was killed when can wait for another post. 

Far east on Yablunska - white armband and food rations - prior to 3/21 - higher marks on fence and sections blown in - fence is on the south side of the street. Suggested: fired from the north, at a relatively close range. Panoramic vide from a video.

A photo - the volunteer is dropping off packets seen by other bodies - they contained body bags, gloves and sich for the people coming to remove the corpses.

Add 5/15: possible shelling from the north seen just west of this, by the 4 bodies at the roundabout. Post forthcoming.

Update 4/29: More (neo-Nazi?) drone footage, dated March 12 & 13, was released to CNN, Ukraine again watching but not attacking. "CNN is not naming the individual that took the video over concerns for their safety." Previously, it was the Azov Battalion's Serhiiy Korotkikh who authorized footage release. Are they worried he can't take care of himself, or do they just not want to advertise this evidence is provided by the neo-Nazis who are open about committing summary executions in Bucha? 
Here's a handy view to explain this pattern in context of control, unclear as that is. Where did that tank come from? All the others that just get watched?

Details added: tank seen on March 13 driving east on Yablunska street towards the 7 bodies  - impact 1 is there now (so that strike came between 3/7 and 3/13) - Another tank is seen parked near the east end of Yablunska, at S.R. street - the 2 bodies furthest east seem present already, while another 5 are not there yet, including the one by a shelling crater. (so that strike was after the 13th and before the 21st). The frontline tire barricade and oil smears at Vodoprovidna are not present yet on the 12th/13th. Impact 4 may also not be present.


A house used as a base with has been geolocated to south side of Yablunska, almost next to the future barricade. It was manned with supposed Russian troops mid-day on 3/12. This house in later views: no view at 3/19 where the nearby post has come and gone - house seen, vacated with no sign of attack on 3/23 and forward - a blast next door and fire under the roof on the right on the 28th or earlier - roof also missing before before the 30th. Is that finally some evidence for Azov and friends attacking these tanks, their operators or their basing? There could be even more to that effect waiting to be released. We'll see how convincing it is.

In Review

Azov Battalion drone video, March 23:

Meduza: according to Kateryna Ukraintseva, a deputy of the Bucha City Council. “Yablonska Street, where a large share of the killings took place, became particularly isolated from the rest of the city. Russian military vehicles were stationed on the street, and checkpoints were set up to regulate movement, according to Ukraintseva. “They bombed Irpin from this street,” she told Meduza. “They wouldn’t even let people through to evacuate. It’s the street closest to Irpin. All the rest of Bucha is on the opposite side. And the Russian troops at the checkpoints wouldn’t let anybody evacuate through Irpin. The only people who could see what was happening on the street were the ones who lived directly on it — and they weren’t even allowed to come out of their basements.” Ukraintseva’s account was corroborated by Bucha residents."

Really what separates mortar alley from Russian-occupied Bucha is that it was always a natural no-man's land, shelled from Irpin, and a place Kiev's forces could still operate on the ground, especially in the last days. Mapped below, the pale strip closest to Irpin is probable no-man's land (sort of a basic minimum area), the red strip inside it mortar alley as described above.


On Feb. 27 a massive column of Russian tanks was obliterated - along with a lot of homes - by Ukrainian drone strikes, as it moved up Vokzal'na street. Probably from then on, the area was seen as too open to drone surveillance by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, and to drone and artillery attack, to bother controlling it, or even remove their own killed troops or the civilian corpses they would later deny. 

Russia says: "the southern outskirts of the city, including residential areas, were shelled round the clock by Ukrainian troops with large-calibre artillery, tanks and multiple launch rocket systems." As such, it wasn't an evacuation route they endorsed. (Telegram - Facebook) Azov video based from the south seems to show the same. 

There are signs of likely Russian control along "mortar alley" that was eliminated prior to new satellite views of 3/19, while an informed source maps all east of here as Ukrainian-controlled by that day (tweet). From 3/23-28, Azov drones show 3 supposedly Russian armored vehicles parked here and even manned, forming a basis for control almost to month's end. But these left on their own after the 28th and were never attacked. Just like the some-V "Russian" tanks Azov's drones just watched on March 3 as they shot down a bicyclist the drone had been tracking - those tanks weren't attacked. It's quite likely these were actually captured units, parked there by allies to "prove" the Russians remained in charge. (a post for all of this possibly forthcoming)


But Ukraine's supposedly trustworthy political leaders insist the Russians controlled this street at the edge, and with special brutality, right up until March 28th at least. They say the savage Rusians were gunning down and terrorizing locals and shelling Irpin from there. They'd say all this apparent mortar fire from the south either doesn't exist, doesn't matter, or must've been done by Russians down in Irpin, maybe in retaliation for the Russian shelling coming out of there ... or whatever. They're a bunch of subhuman "orcs", so they don't have to make sense. They would soon be launching razor rain on areas with their own troops, just to terrorize the civilians on their way out of town, under Ukrainian fire the whole way. The beasts!

But there may be some secret logic to all this. There were some convenient twists in just WHO "the Russians" picked out to cleanse Ukraine of. The gruesome spectacle was a huge PR boot for Ukraine and another serious blow for Russia's image; Germany in particular practically set on war footing with Russia following the first news from Bucha. And after the "Russian" brutality recorded there, NPR reported: "One Ukrainian soldier, who could not give his name for security reasons, warned that Ukrainian forces may no longer try to take Russians alive. "Now, with most of our units having the information about Mariupol and how many dead people and those horrible Bucha pictures are available publicly, nobody will capture them anymore," he said. "No one cares anymore. They're all going to go into the ground." "

Sunday, April 10, 2022

Kramatorsk Rail Station Massacre: Debunking Russia's Disinformation

April 10, 2022 (rough, incomplete)

More than 50 civilians have been killed and hundreds wounded in a diabolical terrorist missile attack on a train station in Kramatorsk. Russia was obviously blamed for deliberately targeting the station, knowing it was crowded with civilians trying to flee the conflict in Ukraine's east.

I've been slow to start on this, but so far others have been doing quite well noting issues with this case, and widely. Key points that seem pretty well on-track to me: 

- Russia denies using the Tochka-U missile employed, while Ukraine openly uses it - Russian use is alleged prior to this, but doesn't seem to be clearly proven. Still possible, so turning to more specific evidence...

- the evident trajectory points back clearly to the southwest, all Ukrainian-held to 120km maximum range. Many, many people from both/all sides can only conclude the same. This is not even disputed, only fudged a bit hoping to connect to Russian areas almost due south. 

- the serial number on this one - ш91579 - fits with others used by Ukraine, like ш91565 used back in 2015. Just 14 units apart, these were almost certainly in the same batch sent to Ukraine many years ago.

- and other clues are well-noted, like the eerie inscription (translating "to/for [our?] children") that was probably meant to be seen, to remind Westerners of Russia's supposed fixation on killing Ukrainian children. They learned this word "ДЕТИ" recently with the Mariupol theater bombing, and will be eager to recognize it here.

My help hardly seems needed. So for now, I'll just offer this review of the responses, which I was curious about. Note the evident failure. There may well be a second layer to this story that will complicate things, but so far it seems the actual truth may be on the tip of almost everyone's tongue soon, if not already.

Scott Lucas "Debunk"

Among those "standing with Ukraine" over the Kramatorsk allegations is Professor Scott Lucas, a low-credibility propaganda-peddling British "academic" who runs the website EA Worldview. "EA" means Enduring America, the site's original name. It routinely recycles anti-Russia, pro-war and regime change fabrications fully in line with US-UK foreign policy. And he's worked with the terrorist Majdi Nema aka Islam Alloush of the Saudi-backed Syrian extremist group Jaysh al-Islam, together at the Turkish think tank "Toran Center." He smeared but failed to debunk some of my work, with others, on the Ghouta chemical massacre of 2013. That work showed pretty clearly that the same Jaysh al-Islam Lucas is affiliated with likely carried that out. Hundreds of civilians were killed. It remains extremely unsolved.

Anyway, his site's coverage of this missile massacre in Ukraine explains how Russia's motive was "to “sow panic and fear” and to kill as many people as possible." So it's right out of "the Russian playbook" and adds another page to it. It's always so obvious - you need only see damage and death and remember that only Russia can generate these things, or has the evil motive required. Yet they always think they can just deny it, and do so again, and so poor prof. Lucas is forced to again tackle "RUSSIA’S DISINFORMATION." Promoted here: "Analysts debunk #Russia disinfo trying to blame #Ukraine"

Firstly, "The Russian Defense Ministry tried to claim that Ukrainian forces struck their own civilians, saying only Ukraine has Tochka-U missiles." The Russian denial actually says: "We emphasize that the Tochka-U tactical missiles, the wreckage of which was found near the Kramatorsk railway station and published by eyewitnesses, are used only by the Ukrainian armed forces." (per CNN) They don't deny owning them. Lucas clearly misrepresents what they saw to make a straw man. No valid point raised yet. 

Next, "in mid-February the Russian Defense Ministry was boasting about the munition in exercises." It's also said the launchers are seen in Belarus in a more recent video, painted with V markings and likely headed to Ukraine. These points could be true, for all I know. What proof is there they have brought Tochka-Us in and used them at all, let alone on this drastic occasion? 

"Trying to escape responsibility, the Kremlin insisted that the Russian armed forces had no missions scheduled for Kramatorsk on Friday. " That hasn't been verified or disproven that I know of, but Lucas contrasts it with a contradictory or irrelevant note that "On Friday morning, before news broke of the mass casualties, the Russian Defense Ministry was celebrating attacks on railway stations in eastern Ukraine."

I hear they said "High-precision air-based missiles in Donetsk Region have destroyed weapons and military equipment of the Ukrainian military reserves arriving in Donbass at Pokrovsk, Slavyansk and Barvenkovo railway stations." After news about a different station emerged, I bet their earlier story remained just the same. But Lucas cites Max Seddon with this word game he didn't quite feel up to replicating, but wanted his readers to see:

"Russia's defense ministry initially said it used high-precision rockets on three railway stations in the Donbas today.

But after the scale of the casualties in Kramatorsk became clear, it claimed the strike was a "provocation" that "has nothing to do with reality.""

Again, none of the three towns they named was ever Kramatorsk. THEN after this news, they blamed Ukraine for this further strike which they never claimed. That's not a story change. 

Story changes did come from some uninformed outsiders who just made bad initial guesses. Lucas cites Astra Press relating some of these: https://t.me/astrapress/2063

"The Novorossiya militia reports and power Z-channels reported that the Russian Armed Forces were firing at a “gathering of APU militants” at the Kramatorsk railway station," which messages were deleted or edited when news of mass civilian casualties emerged. "A message about this appeared in the Siloviki TV channel, it was reposted to his Russian Tarantass channel by Russian propagandist Dmitry Steshin." 

Steshin's post remains but was edited, to say (auto-translate): "How did they make a provocation with Kramatorsk? First, they threw in information through publics like "Typical Kramatorsk" about how the Russian Aerospace Forces hit the military echelon of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the station and the railway junction. They even screwed up an indistinct video with smoke. And by the way, I fell for it too. They waited until it sold out and hit "Tochka-U", which has not been in service in the Russian Federation for thirty years. In the LDNR, too, is not available and never was..." 

It sounds like "they tricked us into thinking it was Russia." Maybe they just tricked themselves. Russia claimed train station hits, this was a train station hit, but not one of those they claimed. Someone thought it was. Why is that evidence Russia was to blame? 

CIT and A Russian Use in March?

Lucas enthuses how "analysts quickly debunked the assertions" that Russia has no Tochka-U missiles. Besides clues cited above, he also gives an example - just one - of actual use: "The Russia-based Conflict Intelligence Team documented Russia use of the Tochka-U in early March in northern Ukraine." Did they? No link given, but it wasn't hard to find. https://twitter.com/CITeam_en/status/1500475853490343936

"Russia is now using older Tochka-U missile launchers against Ukraine, as seen in Desnyanka, 40 km from the border with Belarus. Videos and photos show a tell-tale 9M79M booster familiar from Syria and Karabakh. It typically remains intact when a cluster warhead is used."

Here's the photo I found around, always at this same resolution and no better. What "tale" does this engine tell?

Model number: 9M79M 

Serial number unclear: maybe ш89367 or ш89307 or ... all but the 7, really, can be seen different ways. 

catalogued Ukrainian uses: in the 5-digit M79M series: 89390, 89455, 89680, 89816, 89828, 89831, 91566, 91565. (see list widely posted around) The first three are model 9M79M, and all the rest with higher numbers are model 9M79-1. With most missiles that impacted the numbers weren't gotten, but likely fall in between and near these numbers. The one seen in Desnyanka might fit well at the head of that list, before the model switch.

Numbers aside, it seems the earliest postings of this footage claimed, with video: "Air defense of the Russian Armed Forces shot down the OTR "Tochka" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the wreckage that fell in the village of Desnyanka, Chernihiv region" https://twitter.com/Freedom_Slips/status/1500616469280792577

scene - geolocated early on: coordinayes 51.567148, 31.214945 https://twitter.com/5urpher/status/1500455104532652033

verified scene match - facing south at mid-day, this tail section is oriented and clearly traveled left to right. 


Wind will affect this tail section after it detaches, but that should only alter the trajectory a bit, not reverse it or anything drastic. Note the orientation matches with damage first to the road, then a skid to halted, all left to right. That's east to west. Here's how that maps out compared to the military situation at that time - purple = Russian-held. Inset is the area in question, pinned impact map superimposed so all roads match.


That's another clear Ukrainian forces use. Lucas had no other examples of anything but that. I asked Conflict Intelligence Team about their methodology and possibility of error - waiting for a response: https://twitter.com/CL4Syr/status/1513089322647388160

CIT may do better at tackling the trajectory and serial number problems ... but they haven't yet. They point out a SW trajectory could blame Russia, if we take "southwest" just verbally, as a random mix of "south" and "west" where we can look across a whole 1/4 of the compass to include due south. THEN it was probably the Russians, as CIT will have to conclude somehow. I haven't done my own analysis, but here is their illustration (upper left) compared with 3 other angle estimates that were presumably made according to the actual, observed evidence and providing a much narrower, but still fairly wide, range of possible angles. 

https://twitter.com/CITeam_en/status/1512425868815179778


What else they got? "The Russian MoD claims that Russia does not have "Tochka-U" missile systems. This is demonstrably untrue." It is untrue that they say that. They only claim to not be using them in Ukraine, not that they don't own any. CIT finds it "extremely unlikely Ukraine would risk disabling a strategic rail link in a "false flag" attack..." This rail link is likely to be Russia-controlled soon, so why leave it intact? As B at Moon of Alabama notes "As Russia has already interrupted the train lines west of Kramatorsk, and thereby stopped resupplies to it, it has no need to attack Kramatorsk station at all." The Russians will soon be taking it, and could use it. That actually gives Kiev motive to wreck it. 

"...especially given that there is ample evidence of Russian strikes on civilian areas as it is."  This March 6 strike where they incorrectly assumed Russian guilt is one of their examples to assume the same yet again. 

The Russia-based CIT excels at irrelevant wordplay, seems to fail at trajectory fudging, has no word on the serial number issue, - nothing but ideological hacks posing as investigators, feeding from and defecating back into the West's common propaganda trough. "We will still continue monitoring this situation closely," as they always say.

Conclusion

EA Worldview "debunk" in review - here's the whole thing:

RU denied attacks that day - not disproven

RU denied USING the Tochka-U at all - not disproven

CIT analysis flawed - 3/6 was UA use

February boasts - far from proof of active use 

Outside RU fans assumed Kramatorsk was a RU attack - not relevant

RU boasted of attacks on other rail stations - not relevant

Not addressed: forensic evidence, the most crucial: trajectory, serial number point to Ukrainian false-flaggers.

Motive, means, forensics, and precedent all point to Ukraine. Nothing points to Russia aside from Ukrainian and allied propaganda, and that "playbook" of prior accusations that, like this latest one, have been widely accepted and yet barely tested. "Our allies" most likely did this "to themselves" and still, as they say, it's a War Crime, an act of "pure evil." So what can "we" do about that? 

Saturday, April 9, 2022

Bucha Massacre {Masterlist}

April 9, 2022 

(incomplete - last update July 17)

Sub-posts:

Basement Executions in April of 5 men at a Russian base, at least 2 days after the Russians had left it

    "When the Russians Arrived" or maybe the Ukrainians, on March 12, is when those 5 men went missing

A detailed post on mortar alley. - the first place we saw with bodies left out for weeks - most were killed by mortar / artillery shelling from the Ukrainian-controlled southeast. Needs updating.

Some Horrors Russian Troops Left in Bucha: Burned Bodies: 2 Russian soldiers killed in Irpin left out, burned to conceal ID, passed off as civilians killed by the Russians in Bucha - and related issues

https://libyancivilwar.blogspot.com/2022/05/bucha-mass-execution-video-false-flag.html - paused investigation of March 4 execution of 8 men at 144 Yablunska 

Sergei Kolosei, the Bucha Massacre's First Named "Suspect" - Bucha prosecutors messed up big time.

RFE/RL Witnesses and Question About the Bucha Massacre

Killings on Ivana Franka street

Andrew Hill's "Vagzalnaja" Mass Grave "Revelation"

Victims: 

 - The Killing of the Chikmaryov Family: a mother and 2 sons killed, along with a neighbor, in 2 cars, as they tried to flee Bucha early on March 5 - or perhaps on the 6th, or 8th or 9th ... 

 - Irina Filkina

- Oleg Abramov

    - earlier post on Oleg Abramov

 - Karina Yershova

Oleksander Rzhavsky 

 - Zoreslav Zamoysky

Special study on fighting, control, and events: Death in Bucha's Gray Zone parts 1-(8?) - the first 4 are rough, incomplete, but published.

    Part 1 Defended with Artillery - overview of the gray zone defense policy

    Part 2 Making a Dead End on the E373: Feb. 25 accidental crossing of the Irpin river and resultant destruction

    Part 3 Making a Roadblock at Vokzalna Street 

    Part 4 Shelling in the Novus District, 2/27-28 

    Part 5 Bucha both "Liberated" and "Completely Occupied" - forthcoming

    Part 6 the Russians Take Over - forthcoming

    Part Inaugurating a Reign of Terror on Yablunska (18 killings March 4-10)

    ...

Looking for some kind of overview? See starting overview: Towards Understanding the Bucha Massacre - a bit dated, some important updates made, more planned, and both that and this will link to sub-posts and somehow between them cover the entire "Bucha Massacre" pretty well.



Friday, April 8, 2022

Bucha Massacre: Basement Executions in April

< Bucha Massacre {masterlist} 

Basement Executions in April 

April 8, 2022

last edits 4/10

Among those killed in the "Bucha Massacre" are some five men in a basement, bound and shot in the head, apparently. This was useful in showing Russian brutality in an area deep in the north of Bucha, at an alleged Russian base on the grounds of a former children's camp. 

This is far from the corpse-strewn no-man's-land in the south of Bucha that led news of the massacre. It seems those people were killed along Yablunska street well before Ukrainian forces controlled the area, but were mainly killed by shelling from their locations to the south. Many of those, and one of these five, wears the white armband said to indicate support for or cooperation with the Russians. But these victims were clearly bound and executed, allegedly by the Russians, so when and where become important questions. 

citing mainly: CNN report, April 4 https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-putin-news-04-04-22/h_6ae41ea2a3cd3ef832b8c009a8c51793

RFE/RL / Current Time video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-YKSLz536U

geo-location: https://twitter.com/CL4Syr/status/1512070239189561358
camp "Promenystyy" had a photo that matches the basic style - different paintjob now, but same structure and roof style in similar woods - Hromadske reports: "mass graves" were found on the grounds of "the agricultural enterprise "Ukrahropostach"" and at "the children's camp "Promenystyy" 
Coordinates: 50.5642213,30.210995 - set inside Bucha municipal park at the city's northern edge. The grounds map posted there vs. satellite view:

Adding 4/10: images and claims and video from Val, plus Kobs geolocation says this same camp's west edge was "exact same place where some Ukrainian vehicles got destroyed way back on Feb 24." It's not clear if they were just passing by or were setting up base there. It seems like a useful area, quite possibly used by both sides as possible, and in March that would mainly be the Russians.
 
There are also reports of eighteen mutilated bodies of men, women, and children in a summer camp's basement in Zabuchchya, a town south of Bucha and Irpin, but also included under the Bucha massacre heading. (the Times) I think I have a photo from that site, and it's full of terrible mysteries. But I haven't seen many reports on it, and it's a different scene for another post, maybe. 

At this site, "An advisor to the Ukrainian interior minister, Anton Gerashchenko, told CNN on the ground that the five men had been tortured and executed by Russian soldiers." That couldn't be confirmed. Here's Gerashchenko looking on as the body with the armband that usually means pro-Russian is carried by.

Rigor Mortis = Killed in last 2 Days

CNN's report said the bodies "were in advanced stage of decomposition," having been killed at least 4 days ago when Russian force were still in charge. But in fact, they seem to be in the earliest stages of decay because they were killed well after the Russians left. 

RFE/RL's video of removal and a photo with the CNN report include short shadows from the southwest, so early afternoon, maybe 2-3 PM (the building I think it is faces south, with a very slight SW trend, and sun is well SW relative to that). 

It seems about the same time when the bodies are laid, one has his binding cut and two are seen being rolled over, at 0:45 0:53 in the video. 

The bodies being rolled over lets us see an important clue - the first one seems moderately stiff, pivoting on one shoulder to fall on its back all at once, like a plank. No still image really shows that, but here at right, and note his cheeks are almost a living but pale pink, no different from the arm of the man handling him. His skin is not the slightest bit discolored. 

The other body we see rolled has hands that are also normal color, but rolls differently, relaxed and floppy. 

Assuming they died about the same time, this suggests rigor mortis is fading in their group, quicker with some than others. This usually sets in 6-8 hours after death as (I think) calcium no longer used for neuro-transmission coats skeletal muscles with a mineral crust. SOmething about lactic acid buildup also plays in ... I'm a bit hazy. 

Some people don't know this but, whatever the exact cause of it, rigor mortis then fades away after 36-48 hours. 

https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/forensicspostmortem.html

"With the onset of putrefaction, rigor mortis passes off, and secondary relaxation occurs. Secondary relaxation occurs at around 36 hours after death due to the breakdown of the contracted muscles due to decomposition."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539741/#article-27523.s3

That might happen slower in the cold  - I've read that heat accelerates rigor mortis. But looking it up, I see "The onset of rigor mortis is more rapid if the environment is cold." Still, I'm not sure how to include any difference and the coats might counteract it pretty well, so let's just say the usual time-frame and note it might be a bit shorter, not likely to be longer, https://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/Documents/_Rigor_Mortis__in_a_Live_Patient.pdf 

Experts should also have a say on this subject, but until then, my estimate is 36-48 hours before filming time (14:00 on the 4th)  = time of murder: between 2 PM on April 2 and 2 AM on April 3. Later times than this are more likely than earlier ones, but April 1 can't be entirely ruled out. Any time earlier can be. And it might well have happened after 2 AM on the 3rd.

The blood left beneath the victims and on the wall seems pretty well dried, but it isn't pooled anywhere except for in a deep layer of absorbent basement dust. Thin layers running down a wall or leaked into dust will all dry quickly, so hardly any time can be ruled out by this clue. However ...

first videos of the bodies still in place afternoon of the 3rd - earliest 2 postings I found, about 30 minutes apart:

4/3 16:39 local time https://twitter.com/typolinb/status/1510613064760107015

4/3 17:07 https://twitter.com/Meduselchen/status/1510619966722256909

April 3 video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO49tWSCMco

Noteworthy: the blood beneath one victim is still partly wet, and the blood leaked down one's knee is still wet, with no rain here to help explain that. I don't know just how quickly blood dries, but it makes sense that it stopped flowing 12-24 hours before this video, or even less. "Advanced stages of decay," they said.


 

Significance

Even in the north of Bucha, Russian and Ukrainian official agree that Russian forces had left on or by March 31. Any killings after that - as these seem to be - can hardly be blamed on the Russians. Late on April 2.it was announced an operation was underway (special forces regiment "Safari") to clear the city of Russian collaborators and saboteurs. This operation was likely underway at the time of these killings, even if that predates the announced start. 

https://web.archive.org/web/20220402185448/https://en.lb.ua/news/2022/04/02/12441_special_forces_regiment_safari.html

Separately, Azov Battalion's Serhiy Korotkikh posted a video on April 2 of his "Boatsman boys" patrolling Bucha that day or earlier, an overcast hard-to-time midday. As he examines burnt out Russian tanks, he casually gives permission over the radio for people without their blue arm bands to be shot.

See my prior analysis, and adding here Antiwar Soldier's note: "Here is noise corrected video, where a phrase "please do not kill me" and shot is better heard." I wasn't even aware it was even supposedly audible. It's quite possible those exact men killed apparently late on the 2nd, whom Korotkikh approved the murder of. On the other hand, there were probably a lot of other murders besides these five.

Russian Base and Other Clues


V markings as used by Russian forces in the area, are scrawled all over the camp in spray paint, as if to remind the soldiers where they were. 


V markings on 2 cars, after they had been sideswiped and smashed up a bit. It might also be after this sideswiping that these cars and their kidnapped occupants were brought here to murder.

Antiwar Soldier: "Here is one interesting video from Kharkiv where an arrested criminal explains that after a criminal killing they moved the car with corpses of people they shoot closer to Russian controlled territory, so it would look like done by Russians."
https://twitter.com/antiwar_soldier/status/1511780625329664004

Swap in "Bucha" in for "Kharkiv" and it sounds like the probable real story here.

CNN: "The dead men had their hands tied behind their back and most of them had several gunshot wounds, not just to the head, but also to the lower limbs. "

3/18: Ukrainian reports say Russian soldiers have been using Ukrainian ammunition to shoot themselves in the legs so they can avoid fighting. 
https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/russian-troops-reportedly-shooting-themselves-in-the-legs-to-avoid-fighting/
3/27: video appears where Ukrainian soldiers filmed THEMSELVES shooting Russian prisoners of war in the legs with Ukrainian ammunition. To prove the first story? How many times did that happen un-filmed?
https://www.bbc.com/news/60907259

Well these ones didn't shoot themselves, and don't seem to be soldiers, although one wears the white armband. And their legs were shot on about April 2, one week after that videotaped example of what Ukrainian Fascists do to Russians, and maybe to their supporters and accomplices.